Hillary Clinton was listed as an insider threat in an Army training presentation on the best practices for handling classified material and maintaining operational security. According to officials, this was a mistake and the slide featuring Clinton was removed from the presentation. Interestingly, the others listed ( Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, David Petraeus, Nidal Hassan, Aaron Alexis ) are all identifiable as legitimate ‘insider threats’.
Was it a mistake?
It’s been theorized that Hillary Clinton’s mishandlings of classified information are what inspired the slide featuring her as an insider threat. However, the first DNC email leaks exposing those mishandlings weren’t released until July 22, 2016, but the slide featuring Clinton was developed around seventeen months prior to those leaks.
If this wasn’t a mistake, what could have inspired the consideration of Hillary Clinton as an insider threat? Could it be because of Clinton’s various internal and international scandals or undisclosed association to the Russian Uranium Deal?
“As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”
If it was a mistake, what’s the deal with various reports that the DNC leaks were an inside job to expose Hillary Clinton? For example, CNN reported on Oliver Stone claiming the DNC leaks were an inside job according to numerous intelligence experts he’s spoken with. Stone has been communicating with Edward Snowden a lot, too, for his film “Snowden”, so he may very well be capable of obtaining such intelligence.
This raises the question of why such a thing would occur. The only answer that can be alluded to is to invoke a conflict with Russia based on the perception being pushed to the masses. For example, Hillary Clinton threatening war with Russia if any more hacks occur and Vladimir Putin responding, claiming that “If it’s Clinton, it’s war.” That’s not to mention the blame of the hacks and various Clinton scandals being blamed on Russia by the mainstream media, going so far as to suggest that Clinton was poisoned by Putin and-or Trump.
Regardless of how this situation is analyzed, the emerging conclusion seems to be the invocation of Russian conflict.
Bernie Sanders’ campaign was sabotaged by the DNC to get Trump in place to create the illusion of conflict between Trump and Clinton. There’s some evidence to suggest that the Clintons and Trump were previously on good terms, from the strange call between Bill Clinton and Trump to the fact that the Clintons attended Trump’s wedding. Jeb Bush alluded to a conspiracy to place Trump in as a Clinton oppositional puppet.
It ultimately appears as a duel conspiracy to expose Clinton and to invoke a Russian conflict. The culprit, as Oliver Stone alluded to, must be internal entities, most likely the military industrial complex or intelligence agencies, to create a Russian conflict. This would also explain the incredibly strange statements of Trump invoking violence toward Clinton.
They, these eternal entities, seem to want to invoke a Russian conflict by using Hillary Clinton as a pawn and Trump is there to further escalate the matter. Whether or not Clinton is truly an insider threat or not to the military, may not even be true, but they appear to be using her to invoke this conflict regardless.